“Documento Conpes Política Nacional De Ciencia Y Tecnología ” “Documento Conpes ” “Documento Conpes. CONPES En el documento CONPES Colombia plantea estrategias para el desarrollo del Sistema Logístico Nacional, en el que participan difer. Este documento presenta el Plan de Acción Sectorial de Mitigación (PAS) desde la perspectiva .. enfatizó fue la construcción de un documento CONPES de Lineamientos de Política de. Cambio . Política Nacional Logística CONPES
|Published (Last):||10 August 2010|
|PDF File Size:||11.63 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.64 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
After three rounds of work, the experts chose a group of seven relevant factors for Colombia. Regarding the biofuel sector, Bello Pintado and Cotin Pilart found that the influential factors in FLD were the availability, quality and reliability of transport modes, telecommunications’ quality, production system capability, marketplace location, the number of nearby competitors and population density. A combination of expert methods and goal programming techniques were used, cohpes the three most important factors for this sector as being transport infrastructure quality, the region’s agricultural capacity and utility quality and reliability.
This factor is infrequently mentioned in the pertinent literature and arises from the political and social context. GP includes three types of variant: Many authors have considered that cost is a relevant factor in FLD; however, several empirical studies have considered dofumento factors, such as social, technological, economic, environmental, political and regulatory issues.
The fifth factor F 5 was related to the community’s attitude towards a particular project. Expert methods are geared towards making precise questions excluding double interpretation aimed at socumento answers which can be quantified and processed through qualitative methods Lissabet Rivero, Equations 5 to 8 gave: The objective function was subject to the set of constraints represented in equations 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. The second factor F 2 was related to the attitude of local government towards local and inward investment.
This is an extension of linear programming for handling multiple, normally-conflicting objective measures Jones and Tamiz, Consulted on June 25th The proposed methodology consisted of 5 stages: The experts’ ranking of factors was evaluated by calculating Kendall’s coefficient of concordance K.
One of the most important issues regarding such decision is a suitable selection of incident factors due to their effects on costs and customer service level. Other studies by Bennedetti Santos and Rathmann and Rentizelas and Tatisiopoulos provided important findings concerning the field of biofuel plant facility location factors.
Previous research and government reports were reviewed and experts consulted to construct the preliminary list of factors. Colombian biofuels sector cocumento are presented.
These decisions affect initial in-vestment and procurement costs, manufacturing and distribution. This paper was thus aimed at presenting a methodology for defining and hierarchising a group of factors which affect decision-making concerning facility location.
The methodology was based on expert methods, incorporating a goal programming application extended to support weighting. Few contributions about this topic have been made regarding Colombia.
The Conpes report revealed some critical factors to be considered in biofuel chain design, such as transport and communication infrastructure, red tape and institutional weakness. Factors were ranked; each expert ranked the list of factors according to their relevance. However, according to the experts’ judgment, the two most important factors were quality of transport infrastructure and the region’s agricultural capacity.
Document experts had the chance to examine the list to improve it. Furthermore, FLD affect service variables such as delivery time and flexibility Mazzarol and Choo, A study by Hilmola et al.
Goal programming GP was posed in this methodology; GP is a branch of multi-objective optimisation, in turn being a docunento of multi-criteria decision analysis or multiple-criteria decision-making. A good attitude is positive for a project, but a negative attitude can affect its proper development, especially regarding issues related to licencing and red tape.
All other experts’ opinions were favourable for the 0.
documento conpes pdf download – PDF Files
Final selection of factors. Incident factors in facility location: Preliminary selection of factors. A group of 10 experts was selected for the final list of factors: A preliminary selection of factors. Choosing the right clnpes to set up a company becomes a decision that should be carefully analysed.
Chemical Engineer and PhD. Finalmente, se presentan los resultados obtenidos en el sector del biocombustibles colombiano.
Ingeniería e Investigación
Facility location is a high-impact decision cnpes costs and customer service. Several factors which must be considered in FLD have been identified in the state of documnto art; however, not all of them are relevant in all contexts. Factores incidentes en la localizaciones de instalaciones: Equation 2 established that the sum of the expected weighting for each factor W i and its positive and negative deviation had to be equal to the rating given by expert j.
The experts prioritised the factors; the three most documentl factors were the region’s agricultural capacity F 7transport infrastructure quality F 4 and quality and reliability of utilities 3followed by F 5F 6F 1 and F 2 see Table 4. Recuperado el 2 de diciembre de A preliminary list of factors was prepared, based on the state of the art; the list was then reviewed by four experts two academic and two consultants having extensive expertise in the biofuel industry.
Expert opinion was favoured in the lower maximum deviation value of the experts’ opinions. They took two conpee elements into consideration: At this stage, experts should independently review the preliminary list of factors, eliminating those deemed not relevant. The first factor F 1 referred to the region’s security and criminality regarding rebel groups’ activities. Therefore, the final weighting of factors was as follows: